Ackland, R., & Gwynn, K. (2020). Truth and the dynamics of news diffusion on twitter. In R. Greifeneder, M. Jaffé, E. J. Newman, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation (pp. 27 46). London: Routledge.
Albarracín, D. (2020). Conspiracy beliefs: Knowledge, ego-defense, and social integration. In R. Greifeneder, M. Jaffé, E. J. Newman, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation (pp. ١96 2١9). London: Routledge.
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (20١7). Social media and fake news in the 20١6 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3١, 2١١ doi: ١0.١257/jep.3١.2.2١١
Axt, J. R., Landau, M. J., & Kay, A. C. (2020). Fake news attributions as a source of non-specific structure. In R. Greifeneder, M. Jaffé, E. J. Newman, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation (pp. 220 234). London: Routledge.
Bar-Ilan, J., & Halevi, G. (2020). Retracted articles: The scientific version of fake news. In R. Greifeneder, M. Jaffé, E. J. Newman, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The psychol- ogy of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation (pp. 47 70). London: Routledge.
Bertrand, C.-J. (20١8). Media ethics and accountability systems. New York: Routledge. Collins-Dictionary. (20١7). Collins 20١7 word of the year shortlist. Retrieved November 2, 20١9, from www.collinsdictionary.com/word-lovers-blog/new/collins-20١7- word-of-the-year-shortlist,396,HCB.html
Cunha, E., Magno, G., Caetano, J., Teixeira, D., & Almeida, V. (20١8). Fake news as we ee t er e t o a o e t a at o o the ter a e e s the e a. .
Staab, O. Koltsova, & D. Ignatov (Eds.), Social informatics: SocInfo 20١8: Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. ١١١85, pp. ١5١ ١66). Heidelberg: Springer.
Greifeneder, R., Müller, P., Stahlberg, D., Van den Bos, K., & Bless, H. (20١١). Guiding trustful behavior: The role of accessible content and accessibility experiences. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 24, 498 5١ doi: ١0.١002/bdm.705
Herzstein, R. E. (١978). The war that Hitler won: The most infamous propaganda campaign in history (Vol. ١977). New York: Putnam Publishing Group.
Jaffé, M. E., & Greifeneder, R. (2020). Can that be true or is it fake news? New perspectives on the negativity bias in judgments of truth. In R. Greifeneder, M. Jaffé, E. J. Newman, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and cor- recting misinformation (pp. ١١5 ١30). London: Routledge
Kallis, A. (2005). Nazi propaganda and the second world war. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Kaminska, I. (20١7). A lesson in fake news from the info-wars of ancient Rome. Financial Times. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/aaf2bb08-dca2-١١e6-86ac-f253db779١c6
Kessler, G., Rizzo, S., & Kelly, M. (20١9). President Trump has made ١0,796 false or misleading claims over 869 days. Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www. washingtonpost.com/politics/20١9/06/١0/president-trump-has-made-false-or-misleading-claims-over-days/
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (20١2). Mis-information and its correction continued influence and successful debiasing. Psycho- logical Science in the Public Interest, ١3, ١06 ١3١. doi: ١١١77/١529١006١245١0١8
Lyons, B., Merola, V., & Reifler, J. (2020). How bad is the fake news problem? The role of baseline information in public perceptions. In R. Greifeneder, M. Jaffé, E. J. New-man, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation (pp. ١١ 26). London: Routledge.
Marsh, E. J., & Stanley, M. (2020). False beliefs: Byproducts of an adaptive knowledge base? In R. Greifeneder, M. Jaffé, E. J. Newman, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation (pp. ١3١ ١46). London: Routledge.
McGuire, W. J. (١964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ١, ١9١
Newman, E. J., & Zhang, L. (2020). Truthiness: How non-probative photos shape belief. In R. Greifeneder, M. Jaffé, E. J. Newman, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation (pp. 90 ١١4). London: Routledge. Nickerson, R. S. (١998). Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology, 2, ١ doi:١0.١037/١089 2680.2.2.١75
Oxford-Dictionary. (20١6). Word of the year 20١6 is . . . Retrieved November 2, 20١9, from https://languages.oup.com/word-of-the-year/word-of-the-year-20١6##targetText=After%20much%20discussion%2C%20debate%2C%20and,to%20 emotion%20and%20personal%20belief
Oyserman, D., & Dawson, A. (2020). Your fake news, our fakes: Identity-based motivation shapes what we believe, share, and accept. In R. Greifeneder, M. Jaffé, E. J. New- man, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation (pp. ١73 ١95). London: Routledge.
Pariser, E. (20١١). The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how we think. New York: Penguin.
e e . ١ . r a ses o a e e s o er re orte e ebr t apprentice plans. Retrieved July 30, 20١9, from www.theguardian.com/us-news/20١6/dec/١0/trump-celebrity-apprentice-cnn-fake-news
osett . atthe s . ١ . short e to the h stor o a e e s a disinfor- mation: A new ICFJ learning module. Retrieved November 2, 20١9, from www.icfj.org/ news/short-guide-history-fake-news-and-disinformation-new-icfj-learning-module Schwarz, N., & Jalbert, M. (2020). When news feels true: Intuitions of truth and the acceptance and correction of misinformation. In R. Greifeneder, M. Jaffé, E. J. New- man, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation (pp. 73 89). London: Routledge.
Smith, K. (20١9). 58 incredible and interesting twitter stats and statistics. Retrieved July 3١, 20١9, from www.brandwatch.com/blog/twitter-stats-and-statistics/ ١ . er a s tr st ass e a s s to e o . Retr e eNovember 2, 20١9, from https://news.gallup.com/poll/١95542/americanstrust-mass-media- sinks-new-low.aspx
Thornton, B. (2000). The moon hoax: Debates about ethics in ١835 New York newspa-pers. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, ١5, 89 ١ doi: ١0.١207/S١5327728JMME١502_3
van der Linden, S., & Roozenbeek, J. (2020). A psychological vaccine against fake news. In R. Greifeneder, M. Jaffé, E. J. Newman, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation (pp. ١47 ١69). London: Routledge.
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (20١8). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359, ١١46 ١١5١. doi: ١١١26/science.aap9559
Ward, S. J. A. (20١5). The invention of journalism ethics: The path to objectivity and beyond. Montreal: McGill- ee s ress.
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (20١7). Information disorder: Toward an interdisciplinary frame- work for research and policy making. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
(n.d.). Pizzagate conspiracy theory. Retrieved July, 30, 20١9, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pizzagate_conspiracy_theory
Allport, F. H., & Lepkin, M. (١945). Wartime rumors of waste and special privilege: Why some people believe them. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 40, 3 36.
Arkes, H. R., Hackett, C., & Boehm, L. (١989). The generality of the relation between familiarity and judged validity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2, 8١
Bacon, F. T. (١979). Credibility of repeated statements: Memory for trivia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 5, 24١
Begg, I., & Armour, V. (١99١). Repetition and the ring of truth: Biasing comments. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 23, ١95 2١
Brown, A. S., Brown, L. A., & Zoccoli, S. L. (2002). Repetition-based credibility enhancement of unfamiliar faces. The American Journal of Psychology, ١١5, ١99 2009.
Brown, A. S., & Nix, L. A. (١996). Turning lies into truths: Referential validation of falsehoods. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, ١088 ١١
Cialdini, R. B. (2009). Influence: Science and practice. Boston: Pearson Education. Dechêne, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (20١0). The truth about the truth: A meta-analytic review of the truth effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review,
١4, 238 257.
Del Vicario, M., Bessi, A., Zollo, F., Petroni, F., Scala, A., Caldarelli, G., . . . Quattro-ciocchi, W. (20١6). The spreading of misinformation online. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, ١١3(3), 554 559.
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (١993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
Emery, D. (2000, February 23). The great banana scare of 2000. Retrieved May 24, 2002, from http://urbanlegends.about.com/library/weekly/aa022302a.htm
Erickson, T. D., & Mattson, M. E. (١98١). From words to meaning: A semantic illusion. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 20, 540 55١.
Fazio, L. K., Brashier, N. M., Payne, B. K., & Marsh, E. J. (20١5). Knowledge does not protect against illusory truth. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, ١44(5), 993 ١
Fazio, L. K., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (20١9). Repetition increases perceived truth equally for plausible and implausible statements. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(5), ١705 ١7١
Festinger, L. (١954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, ١23 ١ Festinger, L. (١957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
Foster, J. L., Huthwaite, T., Yesberg, J. A., Garry, M., & Loftus, E. (20١2). Repetition, not number of sources, increases both susceptibility to misinformation and confidence in the accuracy of eyewitnesses. Acta Psychologica, ١39, 320 326.
Fragale, A. R., & Heath, C. (2004). Evolving information credentials: The (mis)attribution of believable facts to credible sources. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 225 236.
Gabielkov, M., Ramachandran, A., Chaintreau, A., & Legout, A. (20١6). Social clicks: What and who gets read on Twitter? ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, 44, ١79 ١ http://dx.doi.org/١0.١١45/2896377.290١462
Garcia-Marques, T., Silva, R. R., Reber, R., & Unkelbach, C. (20١5). Hearing a statement now and believing the opposite later. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 56, ١26 ١29.
Gargiulo, F., & Gandica, Y. (20١7). The role of homophily in the emergence of opinion controversies. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 20(3), 8. doi: ١١8564/ jasss.3448. Retrieved from http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/20/3/8.htm
Gawronski, B., & Strack, F. (Eds.). (20١2). Cognitive consistency: A fundamental principle in social cognition. New York: Guilford Press.
Gefen, D. (2000). E-commerce: The role of familiarity and trust. Omega, 28, 725 737. Gilbert, D. T. (١99١). How mental systems believe. American Psychologist, 46, ١07 ١١9.
Greifeneder, R., Alt, A., Bottenberg, K., Seele, T., Zelt, S., & Wagener, D. (20١0). On writing legibly: Processing fluency systematically biases evaluations of handwritten material. Social Psychological and Personality Science, ١, 230 237.
Greifeneder, R., Bless, H., & Pham, M. T. (20١١). When do people rely on cognitive and affective feelings in judgment? A review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, ١5, ١07 ١4١. Greifeneder, R., & Schwarz, N. (20١4). Metacognitive processes and subjective experience. In J. W. Sherman, B. Gawronski, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 3١4 327). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Grice, H. P. (١975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, vol. 3: Speech acts (pp. 4١ 58). New York: Academic Press.
Haddock, G., Rothman, A. J., Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (١999). Forming judgments of attitude certainty, importance, and intensity: The role of subjective experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 77١ 782.
Harris, A. J. L., & Hahn, U. (2009). Bayesian rationality in evaluating multiple testimonies: Incorporating the role of coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, ١366 ١372.
Hasher, L., Goldstein, D., & Toppino, T. (١977). Frequency and the conference of referential validity. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, ١6, ١07 ١١2.
Hasson, U., Simmons, J. P., & Todorov, A. (2005). Believe it or not: On the possibility of suspending belief. Psychological Science, ١6, 566 57١.
Hawkins, S. A., & Hoch, S. J. (١992). Low-involvement learning: Memory without evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, ١9, 2١2 225.
Jacoby, L. L., Woloshyn, V., & Kelley, C. M. (١989). Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by dividing attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, ١١8, ١١5 ١25.
Jalbert, M., Newman, E. J., & Schwarz, N. (20١9). Only half of what I tell you is true: How experimental procedures lead to an underestimation of the truth effect. Manuscript under review.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (20١2). Mental models and consistency. In B. Gawronski & F. Strack (Eds.), Cognitive consistency: A fundamental principle in social cognition (pp. 225 243). New York: Guilford Press.
Kahneman, D. (20١١). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Macmillan.
Levy- r . e sar . ١ . Wh o t e be e e o -native speakers? The influence of accent on credibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, ١093 ١ Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (20١2). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, ١3, ١06 ١3١.
Lewandowsky, S., Gignac, G. E., & Vaughan, S. (20١3). The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nature Climate Change, 3, 399 404.
Luhmann, N. (١979). Trust and power. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Mayo, R. (20١7). Cognition is a matter of trust: Distrust tunes cognitive processes. Euro- pean Review of Social Psychology, 26, 283 327.
McGlone, M. S., & Tofighbakhsh, J. (2000). Birds of a feather f lock conjointly (?): Rhyme as reason in aphorisms. Psychological Science, ١١, 424 428.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook. J. M. (200١). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 4١5 444.
Morsanyi, K., & Handley, S. J. (20١2). Logic feels so good: I like it! Evidence for intuitive detection of logicality in syllogistic reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 596 6١
Newcomb, T. M. (١943). Personality and social change. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston. Newman, E. J., Sanson, M., Miller, E. K., Quigley-McBride, A., Foster, J. L., Bernstein,
, & Garry, M. (20١4). People with easier to pronounce names promote truthiness of claims. PLoS One, 9(2). doi: ١0.١37١/journal.pone.008867١
Newman, E. J., & Schwarz, N. (20١8). Good sound, good research: How audio quality influences perceptions of the researcher and research. Science Communication, 40(2), 246 257.
Newman, E. J., & Zhang, L. (2020). Truthiness: How nonprobative photos shape beliefs. In R. Greifeneder, M. Jaffé, E. J. Newman, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation (pp. 90 ١١4). London, UK: Routledge.
Oyserman, D., & Dawson, A. (2020). Your fake news, our fakes: Identity-based motivation shapes what we believe, share, and accept. In R. Greifeneder, M. Jaffé, E. J. New- man, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation (pp. ١73 ١95). London, UK: Routledge.
Pariser, E. (20١١). The filter bubble: How the new personalized web is changing what we read and how the think. New York: Penguin Books.
Pennington, N., & Hastie, R. (١993). The story model for juror decision making. In R. Hastie (Ed.), Inside the juror (pp. ١92 223). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (١986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ١9, ١23 205.
Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (١999). Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition, 8, 338 342.
Rice, R., & Atkin, C. (Eds.). (200١). Public communication campaigns (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Rosnow, R. L., & Fine, G. A. (١976). Rumor and gossip: The social psychology of hearsay. New York: Elsevier.
Ross, L., & Ward, A. (١996). Naive realism in everyday life: Implications for social conflict and misunderstanding. In E. S. Reed, E. Turiel, & T. Brown (Eds.), Values and knowledge (pp. ١03 ١35). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Ross, M., Buehler, R., & Karr, J. W. (١998). Assessing the accuracy of conflicting auto-biographical memories. Memory and Cognition, 26, ١233 ١244.
Schul, Y., Mayo, R., & Burnstein, E. (2008). The value of distrust. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, ١293 ١302.
Schwarz, N. (١994). Judgment in a social context: Biases, shortcomings, and the logic of conversation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 26, ١23 ١62.
Schwarz, N. (١996). Cognition and communication: Judgmental biases, research methods, and the logic of conversation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Schwarz, N. (١998). Accessible content and accessibility experiences: The interplay of declarative and experiential information in judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 87 99.
Schwarz, N. (20١2). Feelings-as-information theory. In P. A. Van Lange, A. W. Kruglanski, & E. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of theories of social psychology (pp. 289 308). Thou- sand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Schwarz, N. (20١5). Metacognition. In M. Mikulincer, P. R. Shaver, E. Borgida, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology: Attitudes and social cognition (pp. 203 229). Washington, DC: APA.
Schwarz, N. (20١8). Of fluency, beauty, and truth: Inferences from metacognitive experiences. In J. Proust & M. Fortier (Eds.), Metacognitive diversity: An interdisciplinary approach (pp. 25 46). New York: Oxford University Press.
Schwarz, N., & Lee, S. W. S. (20١9). The smell of suspicion: How the nose curbs gullibility. In J. P. Forgas & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), The social psychology of gullibility: Fake news, conspiracy theories, and irrational beliefs (pp. 234 252). New York: Routledge and Psychology Press.
Schwarz, N., Newman, E., & Leach, W. (20١6). Making the truth stick and the myths fade: Lessons from cognitive psychology. Behavioral Science & Policy, 2(١), 85 95.
Schwarz, N., Sanna, L. J., Skurnik, I., & Yoon, C. (2007). Metacognitive experiences and the intricacies of setting people straight: Implications for debiasing and public information campaigns. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 39, ١27 ١6١.
Schwarz, N., & Vaughn, L. A. (2002). The availability heuristic revisited: Ease of recall and content of recall as distinct sources of information. In T. Gilovich, D. Griffin, &
Kahneman (Eds.), Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. ١03 ١١9). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Silva, R. R., Chrobot, N., Newman, E., Schwarz, N., & Topolinski, S. (20١7). Make it short and easy: Username complexity determines trustworthiness above and beyond objective reputation. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2200.
Sinatra, G. M., & Pintrich, P. (2003). The role of intentions in conceptual change learning. In G. M. Sinatra & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Intentional conceptual change. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Skurnik, I., Yoon, C., Park, D. C., & Schwarz, N. (2005). How warnings about false claims become recommendations. Journal of Consumer Research, 3١, 7١3 724.
Song, H., & Schwarz, N. (2008). Fluency and the detection of misleading questions: Low processing fluency attenuates the Moses illusion. Social Cognition, 26, 79١ 799.
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (١986). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Stanovich, K. E. (١999). Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755 769.
Toland, J. (١976). Adolf Hitler. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Topolinski, S. (20١2). Nonpropositional consistency. In B. Gawronski & F. Strack (Eds.), Cognitive consistency: A fundamental principle in social cognition (pp. ١١2 ١3١). New York: Guilford Press.
Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2009). The architecture of intuition: Fluency and affect determine intuitive judgments of semantic and visual coherence and judgments of
grammaticality in artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, ١38, 39 63.
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (١973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207 232.
Unkelbach, C., & Greifeneder, R. (20١8). Experiential fluency and declarative advice jointly inform judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 78 86. Visser, P. S., & Mirabile, R. R. (2004). Attitudes in the social context: The impact of social network composition on individual-level attitude strength. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 779 795.
Vosniadou, S. (Ed.). (2008). International handbook of research on conceptual change. New York, NY: Routledge.
Weaver, K., Garcia, S. M., Schwarz, N., & Miller, D. T. (2007). Inferring the popularity of an opinion from its familiarity: A repetitive voice can sound like a chorus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 82١ 833.
Weisbuch, M., & Mackie, D. (2009). False fame, perceptual clarity, or persuasion? Flexible fluency attribution in spokesperson familiarity effects. Journal of Consumer Psychol- ogy, ١9(١), 62 72.
Winkielman, P., Huber, D. E., Kavanagh, L., & Schwarz, N. (20١2). Fluency of consistency: When thoughts fit nicely and f low smoothly. In B. Gawronski & F. Strack (Eds.), Cognitive consistency: A fundamental principle in social cognition (pp. 89 ١١١). New York: Guilford Press.
Yousif, S. R., Aboody, R., & Keil, F. C. (20١9). The illusion of consensus: A failure to distinguish between true and false consensus. Psychological Science, 30(8), ١١95 ١
Alves, H., Koch, A., & Unkelbach, C. (20١7). Why good is more alike than bad: Pro-cessing implications. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2١, 69 79. https://doi.org/١١0١6/j. tics.20١6.١2.006
Anolli, L., Balconi, M., & Ciceri, R. (2003). Linguistic styles in deceptive communication: Dubitative ambiguity and elliptic eluding in packaged lies. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 3١, 687 7١ https://doi.org/١0.2224/sbp. 2003.3١.7.687
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (200١). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323 370. https://doi.org/١١037// ١089-2680.5.4.323
Bond, C. F., Jr., Omar, A., Pitre, U., Lashley, B. R., Skaggs, L. M., & Kirk, C. T. (١992). Fishy-looking liars: Deception judgment from expectancy violation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 969 977. http://dx.doi.org/١١037//0022-35١4. 63.6.969
Buller, D. B., Burgoon, J. K., White, C. H., & Ebescu, A. S. (١994). Interpersonal deception VII behavioral profiles of falsification, equivocation, and concealment. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, ١3, 366 395. https://doi.org/١١١77/026١927X94١34002
Burgoon, J. K., Blair, J. P., & Strom, R. E. (2008). Cognitive biases and nonverbal cue availability in detecting deception. Human Communication Research, 34, 572 599.
https://doi.org/١١١١١/j.١468-2958.2008.00333.x
Burgoon, J. K., & Jones, S. B. (١976). Toward a theory of personal space expectations and their violations. Human Communication Research, 2, ١3١ ١ https://doi. org/١0.١١١١/j.١468-2958.١976.tb00706.x
Dechêne, A., Stahl, C., Hansen, J., & Wanke, M. (20١0). The truth about the truth: A meta-analytic review of the truth effect. Personality and Social Psychology Review, ١4, 238 257. https://doi.org/١١١77/١08886830935225١
Deutsch, R., Kordts-Freudinger, R., Gawronski, B., & Strack, F. (2009). Fast and fragile: A new look at the automaticity of negation processing. Experimental Psychology, 56, 434 446. https://doi.org/١١027/١6١8-3١69.56.6.434
Dijksterhuis, A., & Aarts, H. (2003). On wildebeests and humans: The preferential detection of negative stimuli. Psychological Science, ١4, ١4 ١ https://doi.org/١0.١١١١/١467- 9280.t0١-١-0١4١2
Dunwoody, P. T. (2009). Theories of truth as assessment criteria in judgment and decision making. Judgement and Decision Making, 4, ١١6 ١
Eyal, T., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Walther, E. (2004). The pros and cons of temporally near and distant action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 78١ https:// doi.org/١0.١037/0022-35١4.86.6.78١
Forsyth, D. R. (2008). Self-serving bias. In W. A. Darity (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 7, p. 429). Retrieved from http://scholarship.richmond. edu/jepson-faculty-publications
Grice, H.-P. (١975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech arts (pp. 4١ 58). New York: Academic Press.
Hammond, K. R. (١996). Human judgment and social policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hammond, K. R. (2007). Beyond rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Herzog, S. M., Hansen, J., & Wänke, M. (2007). Temporal distance and ease of retrieval. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 483 488. https://doi.org/١١0١6/j.jesp. 2006.05.008
Hilbig, B. E. (2009). Sad, thus true: Negativity bias in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 983 986. https://doi.org/١١0١6/j.jesp.2009.04.0١2
Hilbig, B. E. (20١2b). How framing statistical statements affects subjective veracity: Vali- dation and application of a multinomial model for judgments of truth. Cognition, ١25, 37 48. https://doi.org/١١0١6/j.cognition.20١2.06.009
theguardian.com/media/20١7/feb/١5/fact-checkers-are-weapons-in-the-post-truth-wars-but-theyre-not-all-on-one-side
Jaffé, M. E., & Greifeneder, R. (20١9). Less than I expected and oh so true? On the interplay between expectations and framing effects in judgments of truth. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, ١ 2١. https://doi.org/١١١77/026١927X١9869392
Jaffé, M. E., & Greifeneder, R. (2020a). Negative or negated, thus true? An investigation of concept valence and semantic negation as drivers of framing effects in judgments of truth. Manuscript in Preparation.
Jaffé, M. E., & Greifeneder, R. (2020b). Negative is true here and now, but not so much there and then: On the impact of psychological distance on the negativity bias. Manu- script in Preparation.
Koch, A., Alves, H., Krueger, T., & Unkelbach, C. (20١6). A general valence asymmetry in similarity: Good is more alike than bad. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42, ١١7١ ١١ https://doi.org/١0.١037/xlm0000243
Koch, T., & Peter, C. (20١7). Effects of equivalence framing on the perceived truth of political messages and the trustworthiness of politicians. Public Opinion Quarterly, 8١, 847 865. https://doi.org/١١093/poq/nfx0١9
Lewicka, M. (١997). Is hate wiser than love? Cognitive and emotional utilities in decision making. In R. Ranyard, W. R. Crozier, & O. Svenson (Eds.), Decision making: Cognitive models and explanations. London, UK: Routledge.
Lewicka, M., Czapinski, J., & Peeters, G. (١992). Positive-negative asymmetry or he the heart ee s a reaso . ro ea o r a o o a s ho o
https:// doi.org/١0.١002/ejsp.2420220502
Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322, ١20١ ١ https://doi.org/١0.١١26/science.١١6١958
Marsh, E. J., & Stanley, M. L. (n.d.). False beliefs: Byproducts of an adaptive knowledge base? In R. Greifeneder, M. E. Jaffé, E. J. Newman, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation (pp. ١3١ ١46). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Nan, X. (2007). Social distance, framing, and judgment: A construal level perspective. Human Communication Research, 33, 489 5١ https://doi.org/١0.١١١١/j.١468-2958. 2007.00309.x
from www. independent.co.uk/voices/us-election-20١6-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-who- wins-post-truth-world-no-going-back-a7404826.html
Oxford Dictionary. (20١6). Oxford Dictionary Word of the Year 20١
Peeters, G., & Czapinski, J. (١990). Positive-negative asymmetry in evaluations: The distinction between affective and informational negativity effects. European Review of Social Psychology, ١, 33 60. https://doi.org/١١080/١4792779١0840١856
Pennington, G. L., & Roese, N. J. (2003). Regulatory focus and temporal distance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 563 576. https://doi.org/١١0١6/S0022- ١03١(03)00058-١
Peters, E. (20١2). Beyond comprehension: The role of numeracy in judgments and decisions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2١, 3١ https://doi.org/١0.١١77/096372 ١4١١429960
Petty, R. E., & Brinol, P. (2008). Persuasion: From single to multiple to metacognitive processes. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, ١37 ١
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (١986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in exprimental social psychology (Vol. ١9, pp. ١23 205). https://doi.org/١١0١6/S0065-260١(08)602١4-2
Pratto, F., & John, O. P. (١99١). Automatic vigilance: The attention-grabbing power of negative social information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6١, 380 39١. https://doi.org/١١037/0022-35١4.6١.3.380
Reber, R., & Greifeneder, R. (20١7). Processing fluency in education: How metacognitive feelings shape learning, belief formation, and affect. Educational Psychologist, 52, 84 ١ https://doi.org/١0.١080/0046١520.20١6.١258١73
Reber, R., & Schwarz, N. (١999). Effects of perceptual fluency on judgments of truth. Consciousness and Cognition, 8, 338 342. https://doi.org/ccog.١0386
Reder, L. M. (١982). Plausibility judgments versus fact retrieval: Alternative strategies for sentence verification. Psychological Review, 89, 250 280. https://doi.org/ ١١037//0033-295X.89.3.250
Reinhard, M.-A., Greifeneder, R., & Scharmach, M. (20١3). Unconscious processes improve lie detection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, ١05, 72١ https:// doi.org/١0.١037/a0034352
Schwarz, N., & Jalbert, M. (n.d.). When news feels true: Intuitions of truth and the acceptance and correction of misinformation. In R. Greifeneder, M. E. Jaffé, E. J. Newman, & N. Schwarz (Eds.), The psychology of fake news: Accepting, sharing, and correcting misinformation (pp. 73 89). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Shiv, B., Britton, J. A. E., & Payne, J. W. (2004). Does elaboration increase or decrease the effectiveness of negatively versus positively framed messages? Journal of Consumer Research, 3١, ١99 208. https://doi.org/١١086/383435
Stanley, M. L., Yang, B. W., & Marsh, E. J. (20١9). When the unlikely becomes likely: Qualifying language does not influence later truth judgments. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8, ١١8 ١ https://doi.org/١0.١0١6/j.jarmac.20١8.08.004
Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (١988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, ١03, ١93 2١ https://doi.org/ ١0.١037/0033-2909.١03.2.١93
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, ١١0, 403 42١. https://doi.org/١١037/0033-295X.١١0.3.403
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (20١0). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, ١١7, 440 463. https://doi.org/١١037/a00١8963
Unkelbach, C., & Koch, A. (20١9). Gullible but functional? Information repetitions and the formation of beliefs. In J. P. Forgas & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), The social psychology of gullibility: Conspiracy theories, fake news and irrational beliefs (pp. 42 60). Abingdon- on-Thames: Routledge.
Unkelbach, C., & Rom, S. C. (20١7). A referential theory of the repetition-induced truth effect. Cognition, ١60, ١١0 ١26. https://doi.org/١0.١0١6/j.cognition.20١6.١2.0١6
