Adams, Z., Osman, M., Bechlivanidis, C., & Meder, B. (2023). (Why) is misinformation a problem? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(6), 1436– https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221141344.
Ahluwalia, R. (2000). Examination of psychological processes underlying resistance to persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(2), 217– https://doi.org/10.1086/314321.
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211– https://doi.org/ 10.1257/jep.31.2.211.
Amin, A. B., Bednarczyk, R. A., Ray, C. E. et al. (2017). Association of moral values with vaccine hesitancy. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(12), 873– https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0256-5.
Anderson, L. R., & McGuire, W. J. (1965). Prior reassurance of group consen- sus as a factor in producing resistance to persuasion. Sociometry, 28(1), 44– https://doi.org/10.2307/2786084.
Atkin, C. K., & Freimuth, V. (2013). Guidelines for formative evaluation research in campaign design. In R. E. Rice & C. K. Atkin (Eds.), Public communication campaigns (Vol. 4, pp. 53–68). SAGE.
Balmas, M. (2014). When fake news becomes real: Combined exposure to multiple news sources and political attitudes of inefficacy, alienation, and cynicism. Communication Research, 41(3), 430– https://doi.org/ 10.1177/0093650212453600.
Banas, J. A. (2020). Inoculation theory. In J. Van den Bulck, D. R. Ewoldsen, M.-L. Mares, & E. Scharrer (Eds.), International encyclopedia of media psych- ology (pp. 1–8). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011071 .iemp0285.
Banas, J. A., Bessarabova, E., Penkauskas, M. C., & Talbert, N. (2023). Inoculating against anti-vaccination conspiracies. Health Communication, 39(9), 1760– https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2023.2235733.
Banas, J. A., & Miller, G. (2013). Inducing resistance to conspiracy theory propaganda: Testing inoculation and metainoculation strategies. Human Communication Research, 39(2), 184– https://doi.org/10.1111/ hcre.12000.
Banas, J. A., & Rains, S. A. (2010). A meta-analysis of research on inoculation theory. Communication Monographs, 77(3), 281– https://doi.org/ 10.1080/03637751003758193.
Banas, J. A., & Richards, A. S. (2017). Apprehension or motivation to defend attitudes? Exploring the underlying threat mechanism in inoculation-induced resistance to persuasion. Communication Monographs, 84(2), 164– https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2017.1307999.
Basol, M., Roozenbeek, J., Berriche, M. et al. (2021). Towards psychological herd immunity: Cross-cultural evidence for two prebunking interventions against COVID-19 misinformation. Big Data & Society, 8(1), 205395172110138. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211013868.
Basol, M., Roozenbeek, J., & Van der Linden, S. (2020). Good news about bad news: Gamified inoculation boosts confidence and cognitive immunity against fake news. Journal of Cognition, 3(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.5334/ joc.91.
Beauvois, J. L., & Joule, R. (1996). A radical dissonance theory. Taylor & Francis.
Bessarabova, E., Banas, J. A., Reinikainen, H. et al. (2024). Assessing inocula- tion’s effectiveness in motivating resistance to conspiracy propaganda in Finnish and United States samples. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1416722. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1416722.
Boman, C. D. (2023). Protecting against disinformation: Using inoculation to cultivate reactance toward astroturf attacks. Journal of Public Relations Research, 35, 162– https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2023.2195184.
Boman, C. D., & Schneider, E. J. (2021). Finding an antidote: Testing the use of proactive crisis strategies to protect organizations from astroturf attacks. Public Relations Review, 47(1), 102004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev .2020.102004.
Brannon, L. A., Tagler, M. J., & Eagly, A. H. (2007). The moderating role of attitude strength in selective exposure to information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(4), 611– https://doi.org/10.1016/j .jesp.2006.05.001.
Brehm J. W., & Brehm S. S. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. Academic Press.
Burgoon, M., Cohen, M., Miller, M. D., & Montgomery, C. L. (1978). An empirical test of a model of resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 5(1), 27– https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1978.tb00620.x.
Carrasco-Farre, C. (2022). The fingerprints of misinformation: How deceptive content differs from reliable sources in terms of cognitive effort and appeal to emotions. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 1– https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01174-9.
Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario symposium (Vol.5, pp. 3–39). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Chaiken, S., Giner-Sorolla, R., & Chert, S. (1996). Beyond accuracy: Defense and impression motives in heuristic and systematic information processing. In P. M. Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 553–578). Guilford Press.
Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212–252). Guilford Press.
Chan, J. C. K., O’Donnell, R., & Manley, K. D. (2022). Warning weakens retrieval-enhanced suggestibility only when it is given shortly after misinfor- mation: The critical importance of timing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 28(4), 694– https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000394.
Chan, M. P. S., & Albarracín, D. (2023). A meta-analysis of correction effects in science-relevant misinformation. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(9), 1514– https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01623-8.
Chan, M. P. S., Jones, C. R., Hall Jamieson, K., & Albarracín, D. (2017). Debunking: A meta-analysis of the psychological efficacy of messages countering misinformation. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1531– https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617714579.
Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp.73–96). Guilford Press.
Chen, L., & Tang, H. (2023). Examining the persuasion process of narrative fear appeals on health misinformation correction. Information, Communication & Society, 26(15), 2923– https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2022 .2128849.
Compton, J. (2013). Inoculation theory. In J. P. Dillard & L. Shen (Eds.), The Sage handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 220–236). Sage.
Compton, J. (2020). Prophylactic versus therapeutic inoculation treatments for resistance to infl Communication Theory, 30(3), 330–343. https://doi .org/10.1093/ct/qtz004.
Compton, J. A., & Pfau, M. (2005). Inoculation theory of resistance to influence at maturity: Recent progress in theory development and application and suggestions for future research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 29(1), 97– https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2005 .11679045.
Compton, J., van der Linden, S., Cook, J., & Basol, M. (2021). Inoculation theory in the post-truth era: Extant findings and new frontiers for contested science, misinformation, and conspiracy theories. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 15(6), e12602. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12602.
Connor Desai, S., & Reimers, S. (2023). Does explaining the origins of misin- formation improve the effectiveness of a given correction? Memory & Cognition, 51(2), 422– https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-022-01354-7.
Cook, J. (2019). Understanding and countering misinformation about climate change. In I. Chiluwa & S. Samoilenko (Eds.), Handbook of research on deception, fake news, and misinformation online (pp. 281–306). IGI- Global.
Cook, J., Lewandowsky, S., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2017). Neutralizing misinfor- mation through inoculation: Exposing misleading argumentation techniques reduces their infl PloS One, 12(5), e0175799. https://doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0175799.
Cornwell, J. F. M., & Higgins, E. T. (2018). The tripartite motivational human essence: Value, control, and truth working together. In M. van Zomeren & J. F. Dovidio (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the human essence (pp. 71–81). Oxford University Press.
Denner, N., Viererbl, B., & Koch, T. (2023). Effects of repeated corrections of misinformation on organizational trust: More is not always better. International Journal of Strategic Communication, 17(1), 39– https://doi.org/10.1080/ 1553118x.2022.2135098.
Dillard, J. P., Li, S. S., & Cannava, K. (2022). Talking about sugar-sweetened beverages: Causes, processes, and consequences of campaign-induced inter- personal communication. Health Communication, 37(3), 316– https:// doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1838107.
Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72(2), 144– https:// doi.org/10.1080/03637750500111815.
Dillard, J. P., Shen, L., & Vail, R. G. (2007). Does perceived message effective- ness cause persuasion or vice versa? 17 consistent answers. Human Communication Research, 33(4), 467– https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468- 2958.2007.00308.x.
Dillingham, L. L., & Ivanov, B. (2016). Using postinoculation talk to strengthen generated resistance. Communication Research Reports, 33(4), 295– https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2016.1224161.
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., Chang, E. P., & Pillai, R. (2014). The effects of subtle misinformation in news headlines. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20(4), 323– https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000028.
Ecker, U. K., Lewandowsky, S., Cook, J. et al. (2022). The psychological drivers of misinformation belief and its resistance to correction. Nature Reviews Psychology, 1(1), 13– https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-021- 00006-y.
Ecker, U. K., Lewandowsky, S., Jayawardana, K., & Mladenovic, A. (2019). Refutations of equivocal claims: No evidence for an ironic effect of counter- argument number. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8 (1), 98– https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.07.005.
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., & Tang, D. T. W. (2010). Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation. Memory & Cognition, 38(8), 1087– https://doi.org/10.3758/mc.38.8.1087.
Enders, A., Farhart, C., Miller, J. et al. (2023). Are Republicans and conserva- tives more likely to believe conspiracy theories? Political Behavior, 45, 2001– https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-022-09812-3.
Fazio, R. H. (2007). Attitudes as object–evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25(5), 603– https://doi.org/10.1521/soco .2007.25.5.603.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press.
Fombonne, E., Goin-Kochel, R. P., O’Roak, B. J. et al. (2020). Beliefs in vaccine as causes of autism among SPARK cohort caregivers. Vaccine, 38 (7), 1794– https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.12.026.
Garrett, R. K., & Stroud, N. J. (2014). Partisan paths to exposure diversity: Differences in pro-and counterattitudinal news consumption. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 680– https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12105.
Giner-Sorolila, R., & Chaiken, S. (1997). Selective use of heuristic and system- atic processing under defense motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23(1), 84– https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297231009.
Guess, A. M., & Lyons, B. A. (2020). Misinformation, disinformation, and online propaganda. In N. Persily & J. A. Tucker (Eds.), Social media and democracy: The state of the field, prospects for reform (pp. 10–33). Cambridge University Press.
Gunther, A. C., McLaughlin, B., Gotlieb, M. R., & Wise, D. (2017). Who says what to whom: Content versus source in the hostile media effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 29(3), 363– https:// doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edw009.
Hameleers, M. (2022). Separating truth from lies: Comparing the effects of news media literacy interventions and fact-checkers in response to political misinformation in the US and Netherlands. Information, Communication & Society, 25(1), 110– https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2020.1764603.
Harmon-Jones, E., & Mills, J. (2019). An introduction to cognitive dissonance theory and an overview of current perspectives on the theory. In E. Harmon Jones (Ed.), Cognitive dissonance: Reexamining a pivotal theory in psychology (2nd ed., pp. 3–24). American Psychological Association.
Hart, P. S., & Nisbet, E. C. (2012). Boomerang effects in science communica- tion: How motivated reasoning and identity cues amplify opinion polariza- tion about climate mitigation policies. Communication Research, 39(6), 701– https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211416646.
Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. The Journal of Psychology, 21(1), 107– https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1946.9917275.
Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability, and salience. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). Guilford.
Insko, C. A. (1967). Theories of attitude change. Appleton-Century-Crofts. Ivanov, B. (2017). Inoculation theory applied in health and risk messaging. Oxford research encyclopedia of communication.
Ivanov, B., Dillingham, L. L., Parker, K. A. et al. (2018). Sustainable attitudes: Protecting tourism with inoculation messages. Annals of Tourism Research, 73, 26– https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2018.08.006.
Ivanov, B., Parker, K. A., & Dillingham, L. L. (2020). Inoculation theory as a strategic tool. In H. D. O’Hair & M. J. O’Hair (Eds.), Handbook of applied communication research (Vol.1, pp. 13–28). Wiley.
Ivanov, B., Parker, K. A., & Pfau, M. (2012). The interaction effect of attitude base and multiple attacks on the effectiveness of inoculation. Communication Research Reports, 29(1), 1– https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2011.616789.
Ivanov, B., Pfau, M., & Parker, K. A. (2009). Can inoculation withstand multiple attacks? An examination of the effectiveness of the inoculation strategy compared to the supportive and restoration strategies. Communication Research, 36(5), 655– https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650209338909.
Ivanov, B., Rains, S. A., Dillingham, L. L. et al. (2022). The role of threat and counterarguing in therapeutic inoculation. Southern Communication Journal, 87(1), 15– https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2021.1983012.
Ivanov, B., Rains, S. A., Geegan, S. A. et al. (2017). Beyond simple inoculation: Examining the persuasive value of inoculation for audiences with initially neutral or opposing attitudes. Western Journal of Communication, 81(1), 105– https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2016.1224917.
Ivanov, B., Sellnow, T., Getchell, M., & Burns, W. (2018). The potential for inoculation messages and postinoculation talk to minimize the social impact of politically motivated acts of violence. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 26(4), 414– https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12213.
Ivanov, B., Sims, J. D., Compton, J. et al. (2015). The general content of postinoculation talk: Recalled issue-specific conversations following inoculation treatments. Western Journal of Communication, 79(2), 218– https://doi.org/10.1080/10570314.2014.943423.
Janmohamed, K., Walter, N., Nyhan, K. et al. (2021). Interventions to mitigate COVID-19 misinformation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Health Communication, 26(12), 846– https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10810730.2021.2021460.
Jeong, M., & Bae, R. E. (2018). The effect of campaign-generated interpersonal communication on campaign-targeted health outcomes: A meta-analysis. Health Communication, 33(8), 988– https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236 .2017.1331184.
Jiang, L. C., Sun, M., Chu, T. H., & Chia, S. C. (2022). Inoculation works and health advocacy backfires: Building resistance to COVID-19 vaccine misin- formation in a low political trust context. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 976091. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.976091.
Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 290– https://doi.org/ 10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.290.
Kahneman, D. (2013). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Kemp, P. L., Loaiza, V. M., & Wahlheim, C. N. (2022). Fake news reminders and veracity labels differentially benefit memory and belief accuracy for news headlines. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 1– https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41598-022-25649-6.
Knobloch-Westerwick, S., & Meng, J. (2011). Reinforcement of the political self through selective exposure to political messages. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 349– https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01543.x.
Knobloch-Westerwick, S., Westerwick, A., & Johnson, B. (2015). Selective exposure in the communication technology context. In S. S. Sundar (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of communication technology (pp. 407–427). Wiley-Blackwell.
Kouzy, R., Abi Jaoude, J., Kraitem, A. et al. (2020). Coronavirus goes viral: Quantifying the COVID-19 misinformation epidemic on Twitter. Cureus, 12 (3), e7255. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7255.
Krause, N. M., Freiling, I., Beets, B., & Brossard, D. (2020). Fact-checking as risk communication: The multi-layered risk of misinformation in times of COVID-19. Journal of Risk Research, 23(7–8), 1052– https://doi.org/ 10.1080/13669877.2020.1756385.
Krause, N. M., Freiling, I., & Scheufele, D. A. (2022). The “infodemic” infodemic: Toward a more nuanced understanding of truth-claims and the need for (not) combatting misinformation. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 700(1), 112– https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162221086263.
Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Jerit, J., Schwieder, D., & Rich, R. F. (2000). Misinformation and the currency of democratic citizenship. The Journal of Politics, 62(3), 790– https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00033.\
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480– https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480.
Lazer, D. M., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y. et al. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094– https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998.
Lees, J., Banas, J. A., Linvill, D., Meirick, P. C., & Warren, P. (2023). The Spot the Troll Quiz game increases accuracy in discerning between real and in authentic social media accounts. PNAS Nexus, 2, 1– https://doi.org/
1093/pnasnexus/pgad094.
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K., & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond misinformation:
Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353–369. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jarmac.2017.07.008.
Lewandowsky, S., & Van Der Linden, S. (2021). Countering misinformation and fake news through inoculation and prebunking. European Review of Social Psychology, 32(2), 348– https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2021.1876983.
Lin, W. W. K. (2022). Enhancing inoculation in the spiral of silence to promote resistance to attacks: Examining public opinion on Taiwan-PRC relations. Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research, 10(3), 149– https://doi.org/ 10.15206/ajpor.2022.10.3.149.
Lin, W.-K., & Pfau, M. (2007). Can inoculation work against the spiral of silence? A study of public opinion on the future of Taiwan. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19(2), 155– https://doi.org/ 10.1093/ijpor/edl030.
Loomba, S., de Figueiredo, A., Piatek, S. J., de Graaf, K., & Larson, H. J. (2021). Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(5), 337– https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01056-1.
Lu, C., Hu, B., Li, Q., Bi, C., & Ju, X.-D. (2023). Psychological inoculation for credibility assessment, sharing intention, and discernment of misinformation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25(1), e49255. https://doi.org/10.2196/49255.
Lumsdaine, A. A., & Janis, I. L. (1953). Resistance to “counterpropaganda” produced by one-sided and two-sided “propaganda” Public Opinion Quarterly, 17(3), 311–318. https://doi.org/10.1086/266464.
Maertens, R., Anseel, F., & van der Linden, S. (2020). Combatting climate change misinformation: Evidence for longevity of inoculation and consensus messaging effects. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 70, 101455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101455.
Maertens, R., Roozenbeek, J., Basol, M., & van der Linden, S. (2021). Long- term effectiveness of inoculation against misinformation: Three longitudinal experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 27(1), 1– https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000315.supp.
Martel, C., Mosleh, M., & Rand, D. G. (2021). You’re definitely wrong, maybe: Correction style has minimal effect on corrections of misinformation online. Media and Communication, 9(1), 120– https://doi.org/10.17645/mac .v9i1.3519.
Mason, A. M., Compton, J., Tice, E. et al. (2024). Analyzing the prophylactic and therapeutic role of inoculation to facilitate resistance to conspiracy theory beliefs. Communication Reports, 37(1), 13– https://doi.org/ 10.1080/08934215.2023.2256803.
McGuire, W. J. (1961). The effectiveness of supportive and refutational defenses in immunizing and restoring beliefs against persuasion. Sociometry, 24(2), 184– https://doi.org/10.2307/2786067.
McGuire, W. J. (1962). Persistence of the resistance to persuasion induced by various types of prior belief defenses. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64(4), 241– https://doi.org/10.1037/h0044167.
McGuire, W. J. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 191– https:// doi.org/10.1016/S00652601(08)60052-0.
McGuire, W. J., & Papageorgis, D. (1961). The relative efficacy of various types of prior belief-defense in producing immunity against persuasion. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(2), 327– https://doi .org/10.1037/h0042026.
McGuire, W. J., & Papageorgis, D. (1962). Effectiveness of forewarning in developing resistance to persuasion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26(1), 24– https://doi.org/10.1086/267068.
McQuade, B. (2024). Attack from within: How disinformation is sabotaging America. Seven Stories Press.
Mikolon, S., Quaiser, B., & Wieseke, J. (2015). Don’t try harder: Using customer inoculation to build resistance against service failures. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 512– https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11747-014-0398-1.
Miller, C. H., Ivanov, B., Sims, J. et al. (2013). Boosting the potency of resist- ance: Combining the motivational forces of inoculation and psychological reactance. Human Communication Research, 39(1), 127– https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2012.01438.x.
Motta, M., Callaghan, T., & Sylvester, S. (2018). Knowing less but presuming more: Dunning-Kruger effects and the endorsement of anti-vaccine policy attitudes. Social Science & Medicine, 211(211), 274– https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.032.
Nabi, R. L. (2003). “Feeling” resistance: Exploring the role of emotionally evocative visuals in inducing inoculation. Media Psychology, 5(2), 199– https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532785XMEP0502_4.
Nagel, J. (2010). Knowledge ascriptions and the psychological consequences of thinking about error. The Philosophical Quarterly, 60(239), 286– https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9213.2009.624.x.
Nan, X., Thier, K., & Wang, Y. (2023). Health misinformation: what it is, why people believe it, how to counter it. Annals of the International Communication Association, 47(4), 381– https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2023.2225489.
Nan, X., Wang, Y., & Thier, K. (2022). Why do people believe health misinfor- mation and who are at risk? A systematic review of individual differences in susceptibility to health misinformation. Social Science & Medicine, 314, 115398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115398.
National Cancer Institute (2004). Making health communication programs work.
Newman, T. P., Nisbet, E. C., & Nisbet, M. C. (2018). Climate change, cultural cognition, and media effects: Worldviews drive news selectivity, biased processing, and polarized attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 27 (8), 985– https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662518801170.
Novilla, M. L. B., Goates, M. C., Redelfs, A. H. et al. (2023). Why parents say no to having their children vaccinated against Measles: A systematic review of the social determinants of parental perceptions on MMR vaccine hesitancy. Vaccines, 11(5), 926. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11050926.
Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303– https://doi .org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2.
Osgood, C. E., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1955). The principle of congruity in the prediction of attitude change. Psychological Review, 62(1), 42– https:// doi.org/10.1037/h0048153.
Pandey, A., & Galvani, A. P. (2023). Exacerbation of measles mortality by vaccine hesitancy worldwide. The Lancet Global Health, 11(4), e478– https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00063-3.
Papageorgis, D., & McGuire, W. J. (1961). The generality of immunity to persuasion produced by pre-exposure to weakened counterarguments. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62(3), 475– https://doi.org/ 10.1037/h0048430.
Parker, K. A., Ivanov, B., & Compton, J. (2012). Inoculation’s efficacy with young adults’ risky behaviors: Can inoculation confer cross-protection over related but untreated issues? Health Communication, 27(3), 223– https:// doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2011.575541.
Parker, K. A., Ivanov, B., Matig, J., Dillingham, L. L., & Peritore, N. (2022). Inoculation booster messages: Frequency, content, and timing. The Journal of Communication and Media Studies, 7(1), 1– https://doi.org/10.18848/ 2470-9247/CGP/v07i01/1-19.
Petrocelli, J. V., Tormala, Z. L., & Rucker, D. D. (2007). Unpacking attitude certainty: Attitude clarity and attitude correctness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 30– https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.30.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1915– https:// doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1915.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123–205). Academic Press.
Pfau, M. (1997). The inoculation model of resistance to infl In G. A. Barnett & F. J. Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion (Vol. 13, pp. 133–171). Ablex.
Pfau, M., & Bockern, S. V. (1994). The persistence of inoculation in conferring resistance to smoking initiation among adolescents: The second year. Human Communication Research, 20(3), 413– https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468- 2958.1994.tb00329.x.
Pfau, M., Bockern, S. V., & Kang, J. G. (1992). Use of inoculation to promote resistance to smoking initiation among adolescents. Communication Monographs, 59(3), 213– https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376266.
Pfau, M., & Burgoon, M. (1988). Inoculation in political campaign communication. Human Communication Research, 15(1), 91– https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1468-2958.1988.tb00172.x.
Pfau, M., Compton, J., Parker, K. A. et al. (2004). The traditional explanation for resistance versus attitude accessibility: Do they trigger distinct or over- lapping processes of resistance? Human Communication Research, 30(3), 329– https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/30.3.329.
Pfau, M., & Kenski, H. C. (1990). Attack politics: Strategy and defense. Praeger. Pfau, M., Park, D., Holbert, R. L., & Cho, J. (2001). The effects of party- and PAC-sponsored issue advertising and the potential of inoculation to combat its impact on the democratic process. American Behavioral Scientist, 44(12), 2379– https://doi.org/10.1177/00027640121958384.
Pfau, M., Tusing, K. J., Koerner, A. F. et al. (1997). Enriching the inoculation construct: The role of critical components in the process of resistance. Human Communication Research, 24(2), 187– https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1468-2958.1997.tb00413.x.
Pluviano, S., Watt, C., & Della Sala, S. (2017). Misinformation lingers in memory: Failure of three pro-vaccination strategies. PloS One, 12(7), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181640.
Preston, S. D., & de Waal, F. B. M. (2002). Empathy: Its ultimate and proximate bases. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(1), 1– https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x02000018.
Putman, A. L., Sungkhasettee, V. W., & Roediger, III, H. L. (2017). When misinformation improves memory: The effects of recollecting change. Psychological Science, 28(1), 36– https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616672268.
Reich, J. A. (2016). Calling the shots: Why parents reject vaccines. New York University Press.
Rich, P. R., & Zaragoza, M. S. (2020). Correcting misinformation in news
stories: An investigation of correction timing and correction durability. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(3), 310– https://doi.org/10.1037/h0101850.
Richards, A. S., & Banas, J. A. (2015). Inoculating against reactance to persua- sive health messages. Health Communication, 30(5), 451– https://doi .org/10.1080/10410236.2013.867005.
Richards, A. S., & Banas, J. A. (2018). The opposing mediational effects of apprehensive threat and motivational threat when inoculating against react- ance to health promotion. The Southern Communication Journal, 83(4), 245– https://doi.org/10.1080/1041794X.2018.1498909.
Richards, A. S., Banas, J. A., & Magid, Y. (2017). More on inoculating against reactance to persuasive health messages: The paradox of threat. Health Communication, 32(7), 890– https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2016 .1196410.
Richards, A. S., Bessarabova, E., Banas, J. A., & Larsen, M. (2021). Freedom- prompting reactance mitigation strategies function differently across levels of trait reactance. Communication Quarterly, 69(3), 238– https://doi.org/ 10.1080/01463373.2021.1920443.
Rogers, R. W., & Thistlethwaite, D. L. (1969). An analysis of active and passive defenses in inducing resistance to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11(4), 301– https://doi.org/10.1037/h0027354.
Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2019a). The fake news game: Actively inoculating against the risk of misinformation. Journal of Risk Research, 22 (5), 570– https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2018.1443491.
Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2019b). Fake news game confers psycho- logical resistance against online misinformation. Palgrave Communications, 5 (1), 1– https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0279-9.
Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2020). Breaking Harmony Square: A game that “inoculates” against political misinformation. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 1(8). https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-47.
Roozenbeek, J., Van Der Linden, S., Goldberg, B., Rathje, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2022). Psychological inoculation improves resilience against misinformation on social media. Science Advances, 8(34), eabo6254. https://doi.org/10.1126/ sciadv.abo6254.
Roozenbeek, J., van der Linden, S., & Nygren, T. (2020). Prebunking interven- tions based on the psychological theory of “inoculation” can reduce suscep- tibility to misinformation across cultures. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016//mr-2020-008.
Roozenbeek, J., Maertens, R., McClanahan, W., & van der Linden, S. (2021). Disentangling item and testing effects in inoculation research on online misinformation: Solomon revisited. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 81(2), 340– https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164420940378.
Sangalang, A., Ophir, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2019). The potential for narrative correctives to combat misinformation. Journal of Communication, 69(3), 298– https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz014.
Seifert, C. M. (2002). The continued influence of misinformation in memory: What makes a correction effective? Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 41, 265– https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(02)80009-3.
Seifert, C. M. (2014). The continued influence effect: The persistence of misinfor- mation in memory and reasoning following correction. In D. N. Rapp & J. L. G. Braasch (Eds.), Processing inaccurate information: Theoretical and applied perspectives from cognitive science and the educational science (pp. 39–71). MIT Press.
Sharot, T., & Sunstein, C. R. (2020). How people decide what they want to know. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 14– https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41562-019-0793-1.
Shen, L. (2010). On a scale of state empathy during message processing. Western Journal of Communication, 74(5), 504– https://doi.org/ 10.1080/10570314.2010.512278.
Shen, L., & Zhou, Y. (2021). Epistemic egocentrism and processing of vaccine misinformation (vis-à-vis scientific evidence): The case of vaccine-autism link. Health Communication, 36(11), 1405– https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1761074.
Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast
effects in communication and attitude change. Yale University Press. Sherif, C. W., Kelly, M., Rodgers Jr, H. L., Sarup, G., & Tittler, B. I. (1973). Personal involvement, social judgment, and action. Journal of Personality
and Social Psychology, 27(3), 311– https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034948. Sherif, C. W., Sherif, M., & Nebergall, R. E. (1965). Attitude and attitude change: The social judgment-involvement approach. Saunders Philadelphia. Sherman, D. K., & Cohen, G. L. (2002). Accepting threatening information: Self-affirmation and the reduction of defensive biases. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(4), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467- 8721.00182.
Southwell, B. G., Otero Machuca, J., Cherry, S. T., Burnside, M., & Barrett, N. J. (2023). Health misinformation exposure and health disparities: Observations and opportunities. Annual Review of Public Health, 44(1), 113– https://doi .org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-071321-031118.
Southwell, B. G., & Yzer, M. C. (2007). The roles of interpersonal communication in mass media campaigns. Annals of the International Communication Association, 31(1), 420– https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2007.11679072.
Spampatti, T., Hahnel, U. J. J., Trutnevyte, E., & Brosch, T. (2024). Psychological inoculation strategies to fight climate disinformation across 12 countries. Nature Human Behavior, 8(2), 380– https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01736-0.
Staender, A., Humprecht, E., Esser, F., Morosoli, S., & van Aelst, P. (2022). Is sensationalist disinformation more effective? Three facilitating factors at the national, individual, and situational level. Digital Journalism, 10(6), 976– https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1966315.
Stop Funding Heat (2021). In denial: Facebook’s growing friendship with climate misinformation. https://stopfundingheat.info/wp-content/uploads/ 2021/11/in-denial-v2.pdf
Szabo, E. A., & Pfau, M. (2001, November). Reactance as a response to anti- smoking messages. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association, Atlanta, GA.
Täuber, S., van Zomeren, M., & Kutlaca, M. (2015). Should the moral core of climate issues be emphasized or downplayed in public discourse? Three ways to successfully manage the double-edged sword of moral communication. Climatic Change, 130(3), 453– https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1200-6.
Thorson, E. (2016). Belief echoes: The persistent effects of corrected misinfor- mation. Political Communication, 33(3), 460– https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10584609.2015.1102187.
Treen, K. M. d’, Williams, H. T. P., & O’Neill, S. J. (2020). Online misinfor- mation about climate change. WIREs Climate Change, 11(5), e665. https:// doi.org/10.1002/wcc.665.
van der Linden, S. (2022). Misinformation: Susceptibility, spread, and inter- ventions to immunize the public. Nature Medicine, 28(3), 460– https:// doi.org/10.1038/s41591-022-01713-6.
van der Linden, S., Leiserowitz, A., Rosenthal, S., & Maibach, E. (2017). Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change. Global Challenges, 1(2), 1600008. https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.201600008.
van der Linden, S., Maibach, E., Cook, J., Leiserowitz, A., & Lewandowsky, S. (2017). Inoculating against misinformation. Science, 358(6367), 1141– https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aar4533.
van der Meer, T. G. L. A., & Jin, Y. (2019). Seeking formula for misinformation treatment in public health crises: The effects of corrective information type and source. Health Communication, 35(5), 560– https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10410236.2019.1573295.
van Oostendorp, H. (1996). Updating situation models derived from newspaper articles. Medienpsychologie, 8, 21–
van Strien, J. L. H., Kammerer, Y., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2016). How attitude strength biases information processing and evaluation on the web. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 245– https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.057.
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146– https://doi.org/10.1126/science .aap9559.
Vraga, E. K., & Bode, L. (2020). Defining misinformation and understanding its bounded nature: Using expertise and evidence for describing misinformation. Political Communication, 37(1), 136– https://doi.org/10.1080/ 10584609.2020.1716500.
Vraga, E. K., Kim, S. C., & Cook, J. (2019). Testing logic-based and humor-based corrections for science, health, and political misinformation on social media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 63(3), 393– https://doi.org/ 10.1080/08838151.2019.1653102.
Vraga, E. K., Kim, S. C., Cook, J., & Bode, L. (2020). Testing the effectiveness of correction placement and type on Instagram. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 25(4), 632– https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161220919082.
Walter, N., & Murphy, S. T. (2018). How to unring the bell: A meta-analytic approach to correction of misinformation. Communication Monographs, 85 (3), 423– https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2018.1467564.
Walter, N., & Tukachinsky, R. (2020). A meta-analytic examination of the continued influence of misinformation in the face of correction: How power- ful is it, why does it happen, and how to stop it? Communication Research, 47 (2), 155– https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650219854600.
Wang, Y., Thier, K., & Nan, X. (2022). Defining health misinformation. In A. Keselman, C. A. Smith, & A. Wilson (Eds.), Combating online health misinformation: A professional’s guide to helping the public (pp. 3–16). Palgrave Macmillan.
Wardle, C. (2017). Fake news: It’s complicated. First draft.
Williams, M. N., & Bond, C. M. C. (2020). A preregistered replication of “Inoculating the public against misinformation about climate change.” Journal of Environmental Psychology, 70, 101456. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jenvp.2020.101456.
Wischnewski, M., & Krämer, N. (2020, July). I reason who I am? Identity salience manipulation to reduce motivated reasoning in news consumption. International Conference on Social Media and Society.
Wood, M. L. M. (2007). Rethinking the inoculation analogy: Effects on subjects with differing preexisting attitudes. Human Communication Research, 33(3), 357– https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00303.x.
Wyer, R. S. (1974). Cognitive organization and change: An information processing approach. Taylor & Francis.
Xu, S., Coman, I. A., Yamamoto, M., & Najera, C. J. (2023). Exposure effects or confirmation bias? Examining reciprocal dynamics of misinformation, misper- ceptions, and attitudes toward COVID-19 vaccines. Health Communication, 38 (10), 2210– https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2022.2059802.
Zerback, T., Töpfl, F., & Knöpfle, M. (2021). The disconcerting potential of online disinformation: Persuasive effects of astroturfing comments and three strategies for inoculation against them. New Media & Society, 23(5), 1080– https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820908530.
Zhao, X., & Fink, E. L. (2021). Proattitudinal versus counterattitudinal messages: Message discrepancy, reactance, and the boomerang effect. Communication Monographs, 88(3), 286– https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2020.1813317.
Zhou, Y., & Shen, L. (2022). Confirmation bias and the persistence of misinfor- mation on climate change. Communication Research, 49(4), 500– https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502211028049.
Zia, A., & Todd, A. M. (2010). Evaluating the effects of ideology on public understanding of climate change science: How to improve communication across ideological divides? Public Understanding of Science, 19(6), 743– https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662509357871.
